
Mad Men Stuck in Olden Days
September 4, 2008Somebody at AMC really screwed up.

Let’s say that you are a cable network with a hot show heading into season 2, your best show yet in fact, so successful some fans are impersonating the characters online and writing new dialogue for them (aka Fan Fiction)… What do you do? Easy, if your AMC, you make sure they know how little you appreciate hard core fans and threaten legal action in order to get them to stop.

I love the show Mad Med. Its a great throw back to a pretty sexy, although archaic, romanticized American history. And I am not alone. Some fans dig the show so much they embraced the characters by role playing them on the popular micro-blogging service Twitter [To catch up those unaware, Twitter is a somewhere between blogging and instant messaging, you send little 140 (cell phone text max) or less message to your network of contact].
Twitter folk are on this service all day, especially the die-hards. A lot of natural discussions happen in real time on this site, so naturally people discuss what they are passionate about, promote products, brands, websites, news, etc. This group of people came together organically and chose to have a little fun and play with their favorite tv characters.
Nine psuedo-characters from the show eventually began tweeting, writing in the voices of their counterparts on the show. Its great fun and pretty entertaining, especially when you consider the only people reading what they are writing are other fans of the show that choose to “follow” their tweets. Here is a sampling of tweets from one of the most populr characters, Peggy Olson:
@joan_holloway has it all wrong. I know the other office girls aren’t jealous. They wouldn’t want this job. But I’m not like the other girls (peggyolson)
I’m not sure I’m following these kids with their “young ideas” but Duck says we need them to get new accounts. So here’s to young ideas… (Roger_Sterling)
Bottom line is someone saw infringement here on AMC’s product and brand, Mad Men. Maybe a writer, probably on overzealous, soon to be fired legal type. But if AMC has anyone with some sense that works for them they would have and should have encouraged this. They had something being done for free, that you can’t buy, ravenous fans, evangelists even, of their product promoting it in a fun way to their peers. Was the brand being harmed? Not at all.
Last month I wrote about Online Brand Mascots, using Meghan McCain as an example, and how they can do wonders for a brand by augmenting it in ways that it is unable to accomplish otherwise. These Twitter characters, fan driven or otherwise, were perfect Brand Mascots for the TV show Mad Men. They took the show’s personalities and inserted them online into the daily lives of fans. Allowing fans to connect and be reminded of the show in a subtle an fun way.
My advice to AMC and every other corporatin that thinks they can control their brand online 100%? Get real, its never gonna happen. Emrace the online wild west and position yourself to take advantage of these situations rather than stifling them. I doubt in the long run AMC will get hurt from this too badly, but what they wont know is where this opporunity could have taken them if they had embraced it. Its not too late though. American consumers are forgiving and have a short memory. If AMC does things right, and takes a lesson from Coke and their similar Mentos Viral Video mistake and ultimate embrace of the viral videos, they can make up ground on the faith they have lost in some of their most stalwort online fans. They should not only encourage these Twitter users but should promote their activities, create a community for others to do the same, build a fan fiction online presence based on their show and the fictional ad firm and characters. There are a ton of options, but the longer it takes them to pull their head out of their ass the more potential publicity they waste.
Update: Turns out that the very premise AMC was making about infringement had no legal legs to stand on; explained here in a very good post by TV Barn.
Update: Here is a fuller list of the grwoing “ad icons” as well as “Mad Men Characters”. While this little community expands, you can keep track of it pretty well through a couple of the Twitter profiles, specifially the profile of David Ogilvy (Ogilvy, for the unaware, is one of the top, if not the top, US advertising firms). Here are their avatars and links to their Twitter profiles. Or check out David Ogilvy’s page and who he is “following” for a more up to date break down (double listed names are the replacement profiles for when Twitter temporarily took the originals offline).
joanholloway |
don_draper |
joan_holloway
peggyolson |
pete_campbell |
bertram_coope
Roger_Sterling |
Bobbie_Barret |
paul_kinsey
Sal_Romano |
Bud_Melman |
betty_draper
harry_cran |
helen_bishop |
francine_hanson
midge_daniel |
trudy_campbell |
dick_whitman
duckphillip |
Jimmy_Barrett |
Billbernbach
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged brand, internet marketing, social media, tv, twitter |





They seem to be taking this beyond the realm of the show, as well. I don’t recall Ogily ever being mentioned on the air, but today Jimmy Barrett and David Ogilvy have been trading insults (Ogilvy took Barrett’s wife was out to dinner last night…) It’s hilarious.
http://twitter.com/Jimmy_Barrett
http://twitter.com/David_Ogilvy
yeah i have seen that and other “ad icons” involved with this little community. its a great organic creation. a life of its own.
oh wow, thats so cool. the twitter mad men characters, not AMC’s response. love love Mad Men. Maybe I will have to finally sign up for Twitter to check out what they are chatting about. How often do they chat, just when the shows are on?
My wife is an avid fan of the show, and was very amused when she started following their tweets. Then I started following and now I’m not only enjoying their tweets, but watching the show.
AMC was getting free community based promotion for their show that netted at least one new viewer for no expense of their own, so why squash the fandom?
The weirdest moment for me was sitting in my office at Xerox and having Sal Romano talk about how “The Xerox” will not cost them their jobs and is just a fad.. heh.
i disagree, i think AMC is totally playing it in the character of a 1960 ad agency to be clueless and uptight about the internet. and, btw, it’s ad agency not firm. the minute you say firm, you give yourself away as an outsider.
great post as always
keep it up i look forward to more.
I agree with La Cindy. AMC is playing like so many agencies did then and try to do now. But you can’t control your brand now any more than you could then. It’s just easier today to find out what people are saying about you.
Yet another example of a big corporations not getting how social media operates. In most of these cases it’s almost irrelevant whether or not they are in the right legally; what’s important is that big companies embrace the fans and encourage their brand evangelism. In a David vs. Goliath battle, the social media sphere is going to get behind David. Why fight it when encouraging it actually helps you build loyalty?
[...] AMC apparently tried to stop these Twitter accounts, though I’d bet this is an extremely well-played marketing campaign. There are dozens of these profiles, though some of them are probably fan fiction. I’m having a great time peeling back layer upon layer of historical ad men and Mad Men. Share this article:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]
Meanwhile, @adbroad admitted on her blog that she was @bettydraper, the second Betty Draper. She also admitted to being @francine_hanson and I suspect her of being @helen_bishop, too, at least, due to some lies and inaccuracies in her post–like calling me @jimmy_barrett :))
I’m keeping a followers’ count for all Mad Men on Twitter and related accounts: http://tinyurl.com/madmencount